As a common cerebrovascular disease in clinical practice, cerebral aneurysm mainly refers to the protrusion of the arterial wall caused by abnormal expansion and bulging of the internal arteries of the brain. Its inducing factors are complex and diverse, and are considered to be related to congenital defects of the cerebral arterial wall and increased intracavitary pressure. Surgery is the main means of clinical treatment of cerebral aneurysm. Traditionally, clipping surgery is mostly used. The effect is highly recognized in clinical practice, but it also has defects such as large trauma and high mortality. In addition, there is another intravascular microcatheter interventional treatment.
Clipping surgery is a common method for clinical treatment of cerebral aneurysms. With the support of microscope technology, it is possible to accurately grasp the relevant conditions of cerebral aneurysms and understand the relationship between the neck of the aneurysm and the parent artery, providing a reliable basis for clinical treatment, making the aneurysm clipping operation more accurate, reducing the occurrence of residual, and reducing the postoperative recurrence rate. However, various operations during the operation will inevitably cause certain damage to the brain tissue and surrounding blood vessels, causing inflammatory reactions and affecting the patient's postoperative recovery.
Intravascular microcatheter interventional therapy is a minimally invasive procedure, and its main advantages are small trauma, less bleeding, and good long-term effects. Intravascular microcatheter interventional therapy has certain advantages in reducing surgical trauma. Intravascular microcatheter interventional therapy accurately measures the width and diameter of the aneurysm, and performs surgical operations based on its location and size. On the one hand, it reduces surgical errors, and on the other hand, it can reduce surgical trauma and promote postoperative recovery. Intravascular microcatheter interventional therapy has a lighter inflammatory response. Traditional clipping surgery is more thorough, and patients are less likely to relapse, but the risk is high, and the mortality rate is also higher than that of intravascular microcatheter intervention. Intravascular microcatheter interventional therapy is safer, but it is easy to have residual after surgery, and the recurrence rate is relatively high.
In summary, intravascular microcatheter intervention and clipping surgery each have their own advantages in treating cerebral aneurysms. The former has less trauma, less inflammatory response, is safe and reliable, but has a high recurrence rate, while the latter has a low recurrence rate but a high mortality rate.